S1. Assumptions about the Instrument and Target System
Table S1 displays assumptions about a facility with characteristics like
the planned Keck Interferometer on Mauna Kea on which sensitivity estimates
below are based.
Table S1: Instrument assumptions:
| Aperture |
d
|
10 m
|
| Baseline |
D
|
85 m
|
Center  |
0
|
10 µm
|
| Fractional bandwidth |
 / 0
|
0.3
|
| Background temperature |
T
|
273 K
|
| Etendue |
A
|
1 2
|
| Emissivity |
|
0.5
|
AO Strehl ratio at 0 |
S
|
0.984
|
| Effective efficiency |
|
0.1
|
The value for etendue in Table S1 assumes a single-mode filter as discussed
in section S2, and the adaptive optics Strehl ratio assumes 200 nm rms
wavefront errors. The effective efficiency includes adaptive optics system
transmission, starlight relay transmission, diffraction losses, dewar
internal losses, coupling losses into the single-mode filters, and detector
quantum efficiency (assumed to be 0.75). A further efficiency factor of
0.5 is included to account for use of a nulling beam combiner for the
exozodiacal signal.
Table S2 gives the signal and signal/noise ratios if the observation
target is assumed to be the portion of an exozodiacal cloud located 1
AU from a sun-like star at a distance of 10 pc. The background flux 'B'
and the flux from the central star 'S' in two apertures is 7 x 1010
and 1.5 x 108 electrons s-1, respectively.
Table S2: Fluxes and Signal/Noise Ratios without Nulling:
| Exozodi density (solar zodi units) |
100
|
10
|
1
|
| Exozodi flux Z (2 apertures, e- s-1) |
1.3 x 106
|
1.3 x 105
|
1.3 x 104
|
| Exozodi photometric S/N (t = 104 s) |
500
|
50
|
5
|
| Exozodi excess over star (Z/S) |
1%
|
0.1%
|
0.01%
|
| Exozodi-to-background ratio (Z/B) |
2 x 10-5
|
2 x 10-6
|
2 x 10-7
|
From a strictly photometric perspective, detection of the excess from
a 1-zodi cloud is possible. From a practical perspective, two points need
to be addressed: 1) the small relative size of the exozodiacal excess
relative to the star (0.01% for the 1-zodi case), and 2) the small relative
size of the exozodiacal excess relative to the mean IR background (2 x
10-7 for the 1-zodi case). The latter point is probably the
most challenging. An approach to problem 1) involves a nulling beam combiner
between the two apertures to suppress the light from the central star,
increasing the relative size of the exozodiacal excess. An approach to
problem 2) adds additional nullers at the individual apertures. These
nullers serve as source choppers to provide an accurate calibration of
the background using only OPD (optical path differential) modulation.
{exozodiacal homepage} {table
of contents}
Last updated March-06-1998
|